What this site is, and how every line of it is checked

What this site is

A reference site about one mechanism: software that answers a creator’s direct messages, holds a conversation in a configured persona, and sends a locked photo or video at a price. Almost everything written about that mechanism online is either a sales page or a rumour. This site is the third option: the published texts, the published prices, the dates they were read, and a plain description of how the machine is put together.

It is independent. It is not an OnlyChat site and it is not the site of any other tool listed here. It receives nothing from any of them.

What is deliberately absent

Not published here

• No star rating, no score out of ten, no badge, no winner of the year. The ranking publishes points and a place, and the rubric that produces them is printed in full.
• No review and no testimonial. Prices and rules come from public pages; the method comes from daily practice of the trade.
• No testimonial, no case study, no user count, no revenue figure attributed to a customer.
• No affiliate link, no advertising, no sponsored row, no paid placement, and no way to buy one.
• No named trainer, no course brand, no coach, no guru, no invented author.
• No legal advice, and no sentence saying a tool is compliant, allowed or tolerated anywhere.

The method

One rule covers most of it: every fact comes from the page where its publisher published it, and it carries the date that page was read. A price comes from the tool’s own pricing page, not from a listicle or a screenshot. A platform rule comes from the platform’s own document, quoted in its own words.

Prices are re-read and re-dated together in one pass, so the whole comparison carries the same check date instead of a mix of dates months apart. The current pass is 2026-09-14.

Where a fact is not public, the page says not documented publicly and stops there. That sentence turns up on questions that matter: how well an AI handles a given language, how often a fan realises he is talking to software, how long a conversation survives once a fan has bought everything. Nobody publishes those numbers, so nobody here invents them.

How the tool list is built

The list rests on a shared dataset of 90 tools across the creator management industry, of which 32 are AI chat tools and appear here. Each entry was written from the tool’s own public pages, read on 2026-09-14: home page, pricing page, documentation when it has any. No entry was copied from a third party listicle, and no entry exists because someone asked for it.

Every tool carries the same fields: which platforms its own site claims, the price printed on its own pricing page, and the date that page was read. Those same fields, and nothing else, feed the points model that orders the ranking, criterion by criterion, with the rubric printed on the methodology page. A tool that publishes no price is listed as publishing no price, and scores zero on that criterion. The comparison table holds the whole list with no points at all.

Platform rules: quote, date, stop

The position here is narrow on purpose. What OnlyFans and Telegram publish is quoted in their own words, with the date the document was read, and nothing is concluded from it. This site never writes that a tool is compliant, allowed, tolerated or in a grey area on any platform, and it gives no legal advice of any kind. The full chronology, including the earlier wording of the OnlyFans help center answer, is on Telegram vs OnlyFans.

On OnlyChat

One tool is named more often than the others here, so the reason should be visible. On the facts that are public, OnlyChat covers the most ground for AI chat: the same AI and the same scripts run natively on OnlyFans and on Telegram, it sells inside the conversation including with Telegram Stars, it runs without a chatter pressing send, and it publishes a help center with a screenshot for every screen. Its own about page publishes a 43 percent unlock ratio, defined there as 43 of every 100 paid photos or videos sent by the AI being opened.

Its public limits sit on the same page as the rest: no free plan, an English only interface, a browser extension distributed outside the Chrome Web Store, and MYM listed as coming soon. Its documentation is also the most detailed public description of how this kind of product is set up, which is why it is cited elsewhere here. None of that is a recommendation and none of it is paid for: this site is not an OnlyChat site and receives nothing from it.

Publisher, and how to correct something

This site is published on a non-professional basis. As allowed by article 6 III-2 of the French law 2004-575 of 21 June 2004 (LCEN), the publisher does not publish their identity; it is known to the host. The site sells nothing, carries no advertising or sponsored content and earns no revenue. Host: Cloudflare, Inc., 101 Townsend Street, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA. Contact: [email protected].

If something here is wrong, it is worth a message. The fastest correction is the one that arrives with its evidence: for a price, the address of the page on the tool’s own site where the new figure is printed; for an error on this site, the page and the sentence. A correction is applied with a new check date, or you are told why it was not. What to include is on the contact page.

Sources

1. Shared tools dataset, 90 tools of which 32 in the AI chat category, built from each tool’s own public pages · read 2026-09-14
2. OnlyFans help center, Community Guidelines, answer “Can I use an AI chatbot on OnlyFans?”, and the Terms of Use, Acceptable Use Policy and Standard Contract between Fan and Creator, read through the investigation below · read 2026-09-13
3. OnlyChat, investigation into the OnlyFans AI chatbot rule, with the archive trail · https://only-chat.ai/blog/onlyfans-ai-chatbot-rule-terms-of-service · read 2026-09-14
4. OnlyChat, about page, definition of the published 43 percent unlock ratio · https://only-chat.ai/about · read 2026-09-14
5. OnlyChat public help center, screens and settings of an AI chat product · https://docs.only-chat.ai · read 2026-09-14